ARSENIC IN MY DRINKING WATER?

Since many people are uprooting and moving these days, it is prudent to factor into your relocation site the purity of local ground water. This affects city, urban, suburban and city dwellers - anyone whose water is supplied from the ground. One might not think many people in the US depend on groundwater, but roughly 42,400,000 people (accounting for about 3,350 million gallons per day) are served through domestic supply; and about 91,200,000 people (accounting for about 15,100 million gallons per day) are served through public-water supply.

Arsenic is a toxic substance you can neither taste, smell or see in small enough quantities. It occurs naturally in the ground and is found in highest concentrations in the U.S. West, in parts of the Midwest and Northeast. It is particularly common near old mining areas.

Recently the United States has proposed to adopt the same standards recommended by WHO (World Health Organization) to LOWER the acceptable amount of arsenic for consumption from 50 micrograms per liter (roughly a quart) to only 10 micrograms per liter. This is an 80% reduction which tells us Americans may have been consuming far too much arsenic. This lower ten micrograms per liter is standard in Australia. This new standard will be formally proposed June 2000 and finalized in 2001.

The reason for the proposed reduction of arsenic in water is the cancer connection. Arsenic is known to contribute to skin, lung, liver, kidney and bladder cancers. "Consuming arsenic in drinking water also can cause skin lesions, anemia, nerve damage and circulatory problems. Arsenic is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into the blood. The mechanisms through which arsenic causes cancer are not well-understood, but data suggest that arsenic probably causes chromosomal abnormalities that lead to cancer." http://unisci.com/stories/19991/0326991.htm It has also been reported to affect the vascular system in people and has been associated with the development of diabetes. (USGS press release)

In April 2000, Stan and I watched an Australian "60 Minutes" segment showing the results of high levels of arsenic in the water of Bangladesh. First people's hands and feet blistered and then blackened - especially the feet and legs. When the gangrene set in, the feet and limbs have to be amputated. It is not as though these people have a choice for clean drinking water. They can't boil it as wood is too scarce. Their only other alternative is the filthy flood water used for bathing, cooking, washing and waste removal. Garbage abounds as does cholera. That is their choice: dysentery and faster death, or arsenic and a slower, cancerous death. If was very difficult to watch young adults become multiple amputee victims.

In view of this concern, the USGS has collected and analyzed arsenic in potable (drinkable) water from 18,850 wells in 595 counties across the United States during the past two decades. These wells are used for:

USGS has put together a general map indicating areas affected with too-high concentrations of arsenic can be found.

Click map on the right for larger image.

Approximately 10% of the samples in the USGS study exceed the WHO guideline. Even with this extensive testing, it does not cover every well and water source.

This USGS map breaks out the affected areas by county and color coded for severity.

Click map on the right for larger image.



How frequently are arsenic concentrations in ground water likely to exceed the proposed new maximum contaminant levels?

To look at the Nation as a whole, arsenic data were grouped by county and linked to the number of public-supply systems withdrawing ground water in each county (Focazio and others, 1999). Estimated percentages of small, public water-supply systems that withdraw ground water exceeding six arsenic concentrations are shown in figure 2. Systems were called "small" if they served between 1,000 and 10,000 persons. Focazio and others (1999) provide similar information for both smaller and larger sized systems. The highest concentration evaluated is at the current MCL of 50 g/L, along with several lower concentrations, one of which may become the new MCL.

As the concentration for a possible new MCL decreases, the likelihood of exceeding that standard increases. Just over 13 percent of systems used water with arsenic concentrations greater than 5 micrograms per liter, compared to fewer than 1 percent exceeding the current 50 g/L MCL. Public systems exceeding a new, lower MCL will be required to either treat their water or find alternative sources of supply. This choice undoubtedly will increase costs for consumers while decreasing their exposure to arsenic. Although homeowners with private wells are not regulated, a lower drinking-water standard would mean that more homeowners will be consuming water with concentrations that exceed a standard.

If you are concerned about the possibility of arsenic in your groundwater, one alternative is to take a sample into your local water department and ask them to run a check specifically for arsenic. If you aren't sure where your water department is located, contact the public health department. Another option is to contact your local USGS office. http://water.usgs.gov/wrd002.html lists local USGS state representatives by state accessible it through the interactive map provided.